- The AI Solopreneur
- 🐙 Claude 2.1 vs GPT4Turbo: When I use which model
🐙 Claude 2.1 vs GPT4Turbo: When I use which model
feel confident in your AI usage
Read time: 4 minutes | Sponsor this newsletter
in stadium speaker voice
Ladies and gentlemen!
Let me introduce you to today’s combatants:
In the left corner, we have GPT “Multi Mode Mangler” 4…
In the right corner, we have “Sultan of Word Salads”, Claude 2!
Today, we will settle which one of them is the best!
Jokes aside, you asked me to compare Claude2.1 vs GPT4 Turbo for you.
They will face off in 3 fighting rounds:
…and at the end, we will have a winner, and I’ll share my 4 rules of thumb for when to use which model.
Let’s get into round 1!
Boxing fight bell rings
This EXACT System & Prompt Library Is How I Made $265,000 From My Own Course Using Artificial Intelligence
If you want to:
Research, Outline, Create, And Launch Your Online Course In 2 Weeks Or Less Using AI
Get the exact AI Systems that I used to grow my revenue from 0 to $285,000 in 112 days
Save $10,000+ you'd usually need to buy consulting and services to create a top-notch course
Claude 2.1 vs GPT4Turbo: Writing
Mortal Kombat music starts
When it comes to writing power…
Claude 2.1 has the clear edge.
With its 200K token context window, Claude can deeply comprehend and summarize large volumes of text with ease.
Also, it sounds much more human and natural in copywriting… somehow it picks up the nuances better.
GPT-4 puts up a decent fight when texts are under 82K tokens.
But this first round ends with a clear knock out by Claude 2.1
Round 1 - Writing: Claude 2.1 wins
Claude 2.1 vs GPT4Turbo: Versatility
Versatility is where GPT-4 Turbo lands solid body blows.
It’s able to:
Read and produce images
Listen to audio
Also, it has Code Interpreter, and the GPT app allows you to chat with it while walking.
Not even to mention that you can create your own GPTs.
Since Claude only handles text, it lacks the flexibility of GPT-4.
Sure it’s second to none in writing, but throw other media at it and Claude short-circuits.
For versatility, GPT-4 is champ.
Round 2 - Versatility: GPT4Turbo wins
Claude 2.1 vs GPT4Turbo: Integrations
Both models play nice with third-party apps thanks to their API access.
Claude integrates smoothly with data analytics platforms to crunch enterprise text at scale.
GPT-4 on the other hand gels better with creative tools like DALL-E for its multi-input talents.
I have to give GPT4 the winner here, because its plugins allow the end user to use it with other apps much easier than Claude.
Round 3 - Integrations: GPT4Turbo wins
My 4 rules of thumb for when to use which model
Rule 1: If I have to write anything, I prefer Claude
It just produces better output
Rule 2: If I handle a task where I need any input/output that’s not text, I use GPT4
I find that GPT4’s ability to “reason” around different inputs is very powerful, and it’s great for converting all kinds of inputs and outputs.
Rule 3: If I have a longer prompt, I use Claude
Claude 2.1 seems to retain knowledge better than GPT4.
Rule 4: If I’m toying around with prompts & want to edit them, I used GPT4
I find Claude 2.1 frustrating when I develop new prompts, because I have to wait for the output to try again.
It’s much faster to create & test new prompts in GPT 4.
If you want to learn even more on the benefits of Claude, you can read this Twitter thread:
Stop only using ChatGPT for prompts.
I don't understand why more people don't use Claude.
Here's 5 reasons why Claude 2 works better than ChatGPT:
— The AI Solopreneur (@aisolopreneur)
Aug 28, 2023
I’m enjoying my last week in the sun before I head back to artic
temperatures in Germany.
After living 1 year abroad now, I can say it with confidence:
Life is just better when it’s warm and the sea is close.
I’m still looking forward to my yearly dose of Christmas markets.
What did you think about today's edition?
I built a FREE 5-day Email course on how to use AI to:
• Grow your X & LinkedIn
• Generate infinite viral content ideas
• Automate long-form content writing
These are the systems I used to scale to 130K+ followers & $275K+ in revenue.